Climate Models
CLIMATE MODELS are based on physics and run on supercomputers. They are indispensable for understanding climate, they have been tested, and they work.
-
Model INPUTS
-
Model TESTS from temperature data
-
Model FORECASTING and scenarios
-
Where can I GET MORE INFORMATION about models?
-
How about a VIDEO on modeling?
-
What about responses to FAQ on models?
MODEL INPUTS INCLUDE ALL EFFECTS
These models use natural (e.g. solar) and anthropogenic inputs. Here is a graphic for the inputs to the climate models. Note that both natural (including solar) and anthropogenic effects are included.

Below is a graph of the time dependence of the various forcings relative to 1880, used as input to NASA/GISS models:

--------------------------
MODEL TESTS FROM TEMPERATURE DATA
The temperature is an output of the models, and is not the result of a "fit" to parameters. As shown in the graphics below, the climate models have been successfully backtested against the last 100 years of temperature data (black lines) on a global level and at a continental level. The output of the models including all effects (anthropogenic/human and natural) are shown in red, which follow the data including recent global warming in the last 30 years. Natural effects only, in blue, are NOT sufficient to produce agreement with the data, especially in the last 30 years. Model uncertainties are exhibited by the bands. For all the supporting details, see the report.

--------------------------
Below is the graphic for the model forecasts for the average global temperature over the next 100 years. Forecasts require scenarios. A scenario represents a set of assumptions of human behavior in the future. All the forecasts predict increasing global temperature trends, depending on the scenario: rapidly increasing temperatures if "business as usual" (A2 red), less rapidly increasing temperatures if action is taken against global warming (B1 blue, A1B green). For each scenario, there are uncertainties in model behaviors, shown in the vertical "error bars" (gray) on the right. The baseline (orange) is irrelevant since it assumes no increase in greenhouse gases.
Note that the graph is in Centigrade (one degree C = 1.8 degrees F).

--------------------------
WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ON MODELS?
A thorough description of climate models, with references, can be found in the 2007 IPCC Science Report. For specific global models see, e.g. the Princeton GFDL/NOAA site and the GISS/NASA site (with the computer code here). HERE is an article showing the steady improvement of climate models in comparison with climate data. Here is an interesting VIDEO of recent development of modeling using desk-sized supercomputers.
IPCC Science Report Download Here: Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC.
--------------------------
HERE is a great VIDEO describing the history of climate modeling:
--------------------------
RESPONSES TO FAQ from RealClimate
RealClimate, the approachable scientific climate website run by professional climatologists, has responses to common Frequently Asked Questions FAQ about climate models.
What is the difference between a physics-based model and a statistical model?
Are climate models just a fit to the trend in the global temperature data? (Answer = NO)
Why are there ‘wiggles’ in the output?
What is robust in a climate projection and how can I tell?
How have models changed over the years?
What is tuning?
How are models evaluated?
Are the models complete? That is, do they contain all the processes we know about?
Do models have global warming built in? (Answer = NO)
How do I write a paper that proves that models are wrong?
Can GCMs predict the temperature and precipitation for my home?
Can I use a climate model myself? (Answer = YES)
What are parameterisations?
How are the parameterisations evaluated?
Are clouds included in models? How are they parameterised?
What is being done to address the considerable uncertainty associated with cloud and aerosol forcings?
Do models assume a constant relative humidity? (Answer = NO)
What are boundary conditions?
Does the climate change if the boundary conditions are stable?
Does the climate change if boundary conditions change?
What is a forcing then?
What are the differences between climate models and weather models?
How are solar variations represented in the models?
What do you mean when you say a model has “skill”?
How much can we learn from paleoclimate?
--------------------------
-
Featured Article
RealClimate Rebuts the Contrarians
RealClimate.org is the go-to climate science website run by professional climatologists. RealClimate has excellent responses to many... More »
-
Featured Blog
Please take the POLL and give us some FEEDBACK
Here's your chance to give us some feedback. We are especially interested in knowing if the Climate Portal is helpful to you for action on global warming / climate... More »
-
Featured News
New Scientific Paper Rebuts Contrarian Cloud...
New Scientific Paper Rebuts Contrarian Cloud Claims Video Press Release Background Information Published... More »
-
Featured News
Scientific expertise lacking among 'doubters'...
Here is a significant study showing that the contrarians or 'doubters' of climate change on the whole have far less expertise in climate science than mainstream climate... More »
-
Featured Article
Quick one-liner rebuttals to contrarian claims
The One-Liners Here is a list of quick one-line rebuttals to over 100 fallacious claims by contrarians/skeptics on the popular Skeptical Science website. They rebuttals... More »
-
Featured Article
The Contrarians? Full essay with references
Climate Contrarians or climate science deniers, or faux-skeptics spread disinformation about climate and try to prevent responsible climate risk management. This... More »
-
Featured Resource
Skeptical Science RSS Feed
Below is the RSS feed from the anti-contrarian /denier / skeptic website Skeptical Science. From the site: Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always... More »
-
Featured Video
Videos on Climate Change / Global Warming
Here is a great video of a piece of a glacier the size of lower Manhattan breaking off: Climate Change & Intergenerational Evil 1. INTRODUCTION + DAVID... More »
-
Featured Article
Monckton Myths
John Cook's Skeptical Science website has done it again with a great compilation of Monckton Myths. Christopher Monckton, trained in classics and journalism with no scientific... More »
The Contrarians? Full essay with references
Last Updated on 2013-05-05 at 22:06
Climate Contrarians
or climate science deniers, or faux-skeptics spread disinformation about climate and try to prevent responsible climate risk management. This... More »
James Hansen "Making Things Clearer" on climate
Last Updated on 2013-04-21 at 11:30
New paper by James Hansen - "Making Things Clearer:
Exaggeration, Jumping the Gun, and The Venus Syndrome" More »
Climate Change Seminar, Middletown NJ
Last Updated on 2012-11-05 at 06:54
http://archive.org/details/9-20-12ClimateChangeSeminar
This seminar was held at the Middletown NJ Public Library. It was hosted by the Environmental Committee of the Middletown... More »
National Academies Press - RSS Feed
Last Updated on 2012-09-12 at 21:55
HERE is the National Academies Press RSS feed:
More »
RealClimate Rebuts the Contrarians
Last Updated on 2012-01-21 at 05:04
RealClimate.org is the go-to climate science website run by professional climatologists. RealClimate has excellent responses to many... More »
-
Articles -
Blog Posts -
Galleries -
News -
Resources -
Videos
- Include Content from all Sub-Sections
| Type | Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrieving data... | |||
Site Options